Traditional Versus Modern Approaches in the MENA Region thumbnail

Traditional Versus Modern Approaches in the MENA Region

Published Aug 23, 26
4 min read


Secret obstacles include recognizing and handling these threats efficiently, balancing worker requires with compliance, and adjusting MTC guidelines for secure and cost-effective movement. If handled well, remote work can be a strategic benefit for multinationals, providing functional connection and access to skill. Relying on out-of-date policies could create liabilities, such as unanticipated tax exposure and compliance concerns.

Daida Hadzic is Director, KPMG LLP.

Words by Kevin McKenna, Elder Consultant, EMIR Mirages often deceive the eye in the desert, appealing water and relief where there is none. The Middle East, at the minute, can appear intimidating to global organization leaders who incorrectly look at it as one uniform bloc. Unlike mirages, and regardless of geopolitical stress in the wider area, the Gulf Co-Operation Council (GCC) economies' capacity is no impression.

The Advantages for Operational Efficiency for 2026

Numerous local leaders of international companies still struggle to unshackle themselves from mistaken beliefs and biases held by a worldwide HQ that frequently looks at the Middle East through a narrow keyhole. Global budget plan holders' often misdirected viewpoints can cause missed chances and prevent growth. With over a decade of experience recommending regional magnate in the Middle East, I have actually seen how important it is to make the case for the area by concentrating on these 5 basic actions.

ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+


Nevertheless, this location also operates very differently from our domestic market, so don't expect the very same linear pathways to development and timelines." This strategy needs robust preparation, clear communication, a deep local network and an abundant understanding of the local company environment because, ultimately, you have to deliver on that guaranteed development.

By resolving misconceptions and engaging proactively, regional CEOs can unlock the region's true capacity, changing perceived mirages into an oasis of chances waiting to be discovered.

Arrange a session with our professionals to explore how YCP can help you in resolving your service challenges.

Concerning Israel's questionable policies of limiting humanitarian help into Gaza, the Trump administration has followed Netanyahu's lead. Israel's complete blockade of Gaza from March 2 through mid-May stimulated a remarkable deterioration in humanitarian conditions. In May, the Gaza Humanitarian Structure (GHF), an Israeli- and U.S.-backed option to the UN help distribution system in Gaza, started operations at 4 distribution sites.

Key Advantages for Strategic Excellence for 2026

Taken together, these policies reflect two intertwined aspects of the Trump administration's approach to Gaza: a deference to Prime Minister Netanyahu's preferences and a deprioritization of humanitarian requirements. The administration has actually not pressed back on the Israeli government's plans to occupy Gaza City and by force leave Palestinians into a smaller sized location of Gaza.

He subsequently posted on social networks that the only way to get hostages out of Gaza is when Hamas is "faced and damaged," seemingly offering tacit support for Israel's expanding operations. Meanwhile, the Trump administration's complacent method to Gaza's intensifying humanitarian situationmarked by a formal statement of scarcity in parts of Gazaunderscores the destructive impact of its acquiescence to the Israeli government's rejection to supply sufficient help to the besieged territory. They can best be recorded by unloading how Israel and Saudi Arabiaeach with strong ties to the United Stateshave reacted. Not remarkably, their reactions differ considerably in all three cases. Their actions likewise reflect the growing variation between these two local powers as they pursue widely differing techniques for how to form the Middle East's emerging order.

Israel has actually not translated these military gains into sustaining tactical wins. For Saudi Arabiathe Arab world's current center of gravitythe crucial for economic diversification has sustained a drive to de-escalate stress in the region, a push for post-conflict stabilization in the Levant, and aspirations to build out commercial and trade ties throughout the Middle East and beyond.

Accelerating Dubai Manufacturing Expansion Strategies

As with Israel, nevertheless, whether and how Saudi Arabia equates its broadening leverage into long lasting strategic gains remains to be seen. Israel was highly encouraging of the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear centers.

ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+ANSR July GCC PRs 50DR+


Going forward, Netanyahu will aim to preserve U.S. support, especially if Iran begins to rebuild its ballistic missile toolbox or reboot enrichment. Israel has explained that it will strike Iran againideally with U.S. supportin either circumstance. Absent a clear U.S. "traffic signal" opposing additional Israeli military intervention in Iran, potentially coupled with a U.S.Increasingly, the Gulf views Israel, not Iran, as the primary hazard to local stability. Moving forward, Riyadh will push hard for a diplomatic resolution to Iran's dispute with the United States and Israel. While Saudi Arabia likely is heartened by Iran's weakened position, it sees with alarm the prospect of deepening interstate dispute in between Israel and Iran.

Share us on...

Latest Posts

Why Analytics Shapes GCC Enterprise Vision

Published Aug 28, 26
4 min read